How CDISC standards streamline clinical trials
On March 7th 2012, Clinovo hosted the third Silicon Valley Biotalks, hosted by SNR Denton in their Palo Alto offices. The event welcomed over 60 professionals from the biotechnology and pharmaceuticals industry. The panel was composed of top-tier CDISC experts:
- John Brega (PharmaStat) CDISC Implementation and eCTD Submissions
- Carey Smoak (Roche Molecular) Senior Manager, SAS Programming and CDISC Device Team Leader
- Dave Borbas (Jazz Pharmaceuticals) Senior Director, Data Management
- Ale Gicqueau (Clinovo) President & CEO

- Carey Smoak made the point that the medical device world is on the move to implement CDISC standards. One has to be aware that the simple fact in putting data in an electronic database is quite new for some medical devices companies. Combination products in which medical device interact with a drug is favorable to the implementation of CDISC standards. Indeed, the medical device world is learning from the experience of the drug industry on CDISC standards.
- John Brega mentioned that 60% of FDA submissions are already done in CDISC standards. He also stated that smaller pharma companies adopt CDISC standards faster. Indeed, a lot of the bigger companies have already developed in-house standards and even though they see the benefits of CDISC standards, it takes money and time to transform their processes and change their habits. On the other hand, smaller players that have no or few standards in place are more prone to start using FDA approved CDISC standards.
- One of the advantages of CDISC standards is that it holds the clinical data to a greater level of readability and compliancy in regards of FDA requirements. A submission without SDTM can have a review period twice as long as one under SDTM standards. CDISC conversion allows submitters to find out problems or discrepancies even before the FDA does, which gives more data consistency and confidence for the FDA submission. It saves time and frustration on both sides.
- Carey Smoak said that the earlier the CDISC standards were utilized, the better. The best timing to implement CDISC standards is the database built. There is a real challenge to push CDISC standards upfront in the clinical trial process. He recommended to hire people with expertise on CDISC standards. One should educate themselves on this hot topic and only hire real experts and approved service providers.
- Dave Borbas mentioned existing CDISC conversion tools, such as the open CDSIC validator software, recognized by the FDA and freely available. He talked about CDISC Express, Clinovo’s free SAS-based SDTM mapping tool. Carey Smoak mentioned the development of new softwares, and that applications on smartphones are also mushrooming, but stated that quality, validation and compliancy were very tricky in this case and an upcoming challenge.
- Dave Borbas said that the FDA is getting more and more involved into CDISC standards. FDA calls it “their” standards now, which is new and great signal to the CDISC community.
Do you want to learn more on CDISC conversion?
Register for free for our next Webinar on March 28th at 9am:
CDISC® SDTM Conversion Made Easy with CDISC Express
Categories
- Best Practices (3)
- Best-Practices (16)
- BioNews (3)
- Business Best Practices (5)
- Case studies (2)
- CDISC (11)
- Clinical Data Management (6)
- Clinical Stories (1)
- Code (13)
- EDC (7)
- Event (3)
- Events (7)
- Menu (3)
- Monthly Contest (12)
- New Technologies (15)
- OpenClinica (2)
- SAS Library (4)
- Scripting (2)
- Tips & Techniques (14)
- Trends (11)




Posted under: 
